Collaborative public procurement: Institutional explanations of legitimised resistance

Meehan, Joanne, Ludbrook, Michael N and Mason, Christopher J (2016) Collaborative public procurement: Institutional explanations of legitimised resistance. In: 24th Annual IPSERA Conference, 2015-3-19 - 2015-4-1, VU University, Amsterdam.

Text Ipsera 2015 full paper SUBMIT.pdf - Unspecified Download (366kB)

Abstract

This paper reports on the barriers to regional collaborative procurement developed from an action research study of five UK public authorities in the emergency services sector. Despite political pressure to procure collaboratively, strategic avoidance responses of institutional logics and symbolic tick boxing legitimise stakeholder resistance to isomorphic forces and entrench operational barriers. The prevailing institutional logics are that regional collaborative procurement is unsuitable and risky, derived from procurement's lack of status and the emotive nature of the emergency services. Symbolic tick boxing is seen through collaboration that is limited to high profile spend categories, enabling organisations to demonstrate compliance while simultaneously retaining local decision-making for less visible, but larger areas of spend. The findings expose choice mechanisms in public procurement by exploring tensions arising from collaborative procurement strategies within, and between, organisations. Multiple stakeholders' perspectives add to current thinking on how organisations create institutional logics to avoid institutional pressure to procure collaboratively and how stakeholders legitimise their actions.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Collaborative procurement, Public procurement, Strategic resistance, Legitimacy, Action research, Institutional theory
Subjects:	?? HF ?? ?? HJ ??
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	01 Apr 2015 14:58
Last Modified:	15 Dec 2022 17:13
DOI:	10.1016/j.pursup.2016.03.002
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/2009459