The development of the Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES).

Griffiths, Alys W ORCID: 0000-0001-9388-9168, Wood, Alex M, Maltby, John ORCID: 0000-0002-0621-9359, Taylor, Peter J ORCID: 0000-0003-1407-0985, Panagioti, Maria ORCID: 0000-0002-7153-5745 and Tai, Sara (2015) The development of the Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES). Psychological Assessment, 27 (4). pp. 1182-1194.

This is the latest version of this item.

Text
PAS-2014-13131-final.docx - Unspecified
Download (108kB)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000110

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that defeat (conceptualized as a failed social struggle) and entrapment (conceptualized as a perceived inability to escape from aversive situations) form a single construct that reliably predicts psychopathological outcomes in clinical and community settings. However, scales designed to assess defeat and entrapment measure the constructs separately, whereas recent evidence suggests a single scale would be appropriate. Existing scales may also be too lengthy to have clinical utility. The present study developed and evaluated a scale that measured both defeat and entrapment. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that defeat and entrapment were best defined by a single factor, and 8 items were selected that best represented this construct to form the short scale. The scale had high internal consistency (α = .88 to .94), showed criterion validity with hopelessness (r = .45 to .93) and incremental validity for caregiver burden when controlling for depression and positive symptoms of psychosis when controlling for hopelessness (β = .45 to .60). Additionally, the scale had excellent test-retest reliability using single measures absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficients across 12 months (ricc = .88 to .92) within 4 samples: people with posttraumatic stress disorder, people with psychosis, care home employees, and people from community settings. The scale demonstrated known group validity through discrimination between clinical and nonclinical groups of participants. This scale could be implemented within therapeutic settings to help clinicians identify patients experiencing defeat and entrapment, and incorporate these factors into their clinical assessment and case formulations for treatment.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Brain Disorders, Mental Health, Clinical Research, Behavioral and Social Science, Mental health, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Caregivers, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychopathology, Psychotic Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	04 Jan 2016 09:34
Last Modified:	14 Mar 2024 21:38
DOI:	10.1037/pas0000110
Related URLs:	Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/2044121