How different data sources and definitions of neighbourhood influence the association between food outlet availability and body mass index: a cross-sectional study.



Hobbs, M, Green, M, Griffiths, C, Jordan, H and McKenna, J
(2016) How different data sources and definitions of neighbourhood influence the association between food outlet availability and body mass index: a cross-sectional study. Perspect Public Health. ISSN 1757-9147

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img] Text
data_buffers_paper_submitted.docx - Author Accepted Manuscript

Download (56kB)

Abstract

Inconsistencies in methodologies continue to inhibit understanding of the impact of the environment on body mass index (BMI). To estimate the effect of these differences, we assessed the impact of using different definitions of neighbourhood and data sets on associations between food outlet availability within the environment and BMI. Previous research has not extended this to show any differences in the strength of associations between food outlet availability and BMI across both different definitions of neighbourhood and data sets. Descriptive statistics showed differences in the number of food outlets, particularly other food retail outlets between different data sets and definitions of neighbourhood. Despite these differences, our key finding was that across both different definitions of neighbourhood and data sets, there was very little difference in size of associations between food outlets and BMI. Researchers should consider and transparently report the impact of methodological choices such as the definition of neighbourhood and acknowledge any differences in associations between the food environment and BMI.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Lower Layer Super Output Area, body mass index, buffer, density, food outlets, neighbourhood
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 14 Jun 2016 10:57
Last Modified: 19 Jan 2023 07:35
DOI: 10.1177/1757913916650916
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3001667

Available Versions of this Item