McLeod, Stephen K ORCID: 0000-0003-1457-2942
(2008)
How to reconcile essence with contingent existence.
RATIO, 21 (3).
pp. 314-328.
Text
How to Reconcile Essence with Contingent Existence ELEMENTS.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (520kB) |
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To reconcile true claims of <jats:italic>de re</jats:italic> necessity with the supposedly contingent existence of the concrete objects those claims are typically about, Kripkean essentialists invoke weak necessity. The claim that <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> is necessarily <jats:italic>F</jats:italic> is held to be equivalent to the claim that necessarily, if <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> exists then <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> is <jats:italic>F</jats:italic>. This strategy faces a barrage of serious objections a proper subset of which shows that the strategy fails to achieve its intended purpose. Relief can be provided via recourse to a markedly non‐Kripkean version of essentialism.<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#fn1"><jats:sup>1</jats:sup></jats:ext-link></jats:p>
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | ## TULIP Type: Articles/Papers (Journal) ## |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | essence, existence, contingency, necessity, modality, essentialism |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
Date Deposited: | 17 Oct 2016 13:44 |
Last Modified: | 31 Oct 2023 00:24 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2008.00404.x |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3003820 |