Atkinson, Thomas ORCID: 0000-0002-9800-6173
(2017)
Acquaintance and the sublime: an alternative account of theistic sublime experience.
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 82 (2).
pp. 175-193.
Text
art%3A10.1007%2Fs11153-016-9598-6(1).pdf - Published version Download (467kB) |
Abstract
In this paper I argue that when one has an epiphany of the form ‘God is F’ (e.g., ‘God is wise’) upon having a sublime experience one can be accurately described as being acquainted with the fact that God is F as opposed to inferring that God is F from the experience at hand. To argue for this, I will, first, outline what a sublime experience is, in general, before outlining what a theistic sublime experience is in particular. Second, I will outline two ways of understanding theistic sublime experiences. First, I will outline a model that I will call the ‘inference model’ which, put simply, says that when one has an epiphany of the form ‘God is F’, upon having a theistic sublime experience, one is drawing this conclusion via a process of ‘inference-to-the-best-explanation’ (Chignell and Halteman in: Costelloe (ed) The sublime: From antiquity to the present, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012, p. 426). Second, I will outline an alternative model that I call the ‘acquaintance model’ which, put simply, says that no inferential process occurs when one has an epiphany of the form ‘God is F’ upon having a theistic sublime experience, but one is made directly aware of the fact that God is F. Third, and finally, I will respond to some objections to the acquaintance model.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1 Underpinning research, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
Date Deposited: | 13 Dec 2016 16:15 |
Last Modified: | 16 Mar 2024 12:55 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11153-016-9598-6 |
Open Access URL: | http://link.springer.com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/ar... |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3004861 |