Understanding veterinarians' prescribing decisions on antibiotic dry cow therapy.

Higgins, HM ORCID: 0000-0003-0706-1976, Golding, SE, Mouncey, J, Nanjiani, I and Cook, AJC (2017) Understanding veterinarians' prescribing decisions on antibiotic dry cow therapy. Journal of dairy science, 100 (4). pp. 2909-2916.

Text UNDERSTANDING VETS PRESCRIBING DECISONS ON ANTIBIOTIC DRY COW THERAPY_ACCEPTED.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (420kB)

Abstract

In the United Kingdom, blanket antibiotic dry cow therapy (BDCT) is commonly prescribed. An alternate strategy is selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) whereby a teat sealant is given instead of an antibiotic to cows with a low probability of infection. Switching from BDCT to SDCT can significantly reduce antibiotic use. The aims of this study were to explore how veterinarians (vets) rationalized their prescribing decisions for mammary treatments at drying off, and the barriers and motivators they perceived to implementing SDCT. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 20 purposively recruited vets from 6 practices in England, United Kingdom. The data were analyzed qualitatively using an inductive thematic analysis. The majority of participants stated a personal preference for SDCT because it constitutes more responsible antibiotic use. On the majority of farms, the prescribing decision was taken by a senior veterinarian and BDCT was prescribed. Less experienced vets expressed a desire to be more involved in the decision-making process. The first theme, prioritizing responsible antimicrobial prescribing, encapsulated the difficulties vets expressed engaging with farmers, conflicts of interest, and vets' determination to take action. The second theme, the effect of a vet's experience on their ability to influence farmers, focused on the specific challenges faced by less experienced vets and the importance of vets being both trusted by farmers and being knowledgeable. The third theme, vets' perceptions about the risk and complexity of implementing SDCT, revealed markedly different levels of concern and fears about adverse outcomes with teat sealants versus antibiotics. The results also showed differences in perceptions about how difficult SDCT is to implement in practice. The last theme, vets' suggestions for facilitating the introduction of SDCT, was wide ranging and provided useful insight from a veterinary perspective into ways to facilitate SDCT. Initiatives that seek to alter vets' perceptions of the risks associated with switching to using SDCT are likely to prove useful in facilitating change. Our results also suggest that it is vital for senior vets to take a leading role in facilitating farms to implement SDCT. Less experienced colleagues may benefit from more help from senior vets to gain the trust of farmers and to become involved more quickly in herd-level preventive medicine. Vets must work together and take a united approach to reduce antimicrobial use.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Antimicrobial resistance, Facilitating behaviour change, Trust and risk perception, Prescribing decision
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	09 Feb 2017 08:42
Last Modified:	19 Jan 2023 07:19
DOI:	10.3168/jds.2016-11923
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3005629