Implant maintenance treatment and peri-implant health.

Howe, Mark-Steven ORCID: 0000-0003-2814-4914 (2017) Implant maintenance treatment and peri-implant health. Evidence-based dentistry, 18 (1). pp. 8-10.

Other S-00109-G.rtf - Submitted version Download (131kB)

Abstract

Data sourcesMedline (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register databases and a manual search of the Journal of Dental Research, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Periodontology and the International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry from January 2014 to February 2015.Study selectionProspective, retrospective, randomised or not, case-controlled or case series trials showing the incidence or recurrence of peri-implant disease plus or minus PIMT over more than six months.Data extraction and synthesisThree reviewers independently selected studies and abstracted data with two reviewers assessing study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A multivariate binomial regression was used to examine the data.ResultsThirteen studies were included with ten contributing to the meta-analysis. The average quality assessment score (NOS) was 5.3 out of a possible nine, only one paper achieved eight. At patient level mucositis ranged from 18.5-74.2% and peri-implantitis from 8-28%, with significant effects being seen for treatment (z= -14.36, p<0.001). Mucositis was affected by history of periodontitis and mean PIMT at implant and patient levels, respectively. For peri-implantitis there were also significant effects of treatment (z = -16.63, p<0.001). Increased peri-implantitis was observed for patients with a history of periodontal disease. (z=3.76, p<0.001). Implants under PIMT have 0.958 the incident event compared to those with no PIMT.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of the present systematic review it can be concluded that implant therapy must not be limited to placement and restoration of dental implants, but to the implementation of PIMT to potentially prevent biological complications and heighten the long-term success rate. Although it must be tailored to a patients risk profiling, our findings suggest reason to claim a minimum recall PIMT interval of five to six months. Additionally, it must be stressed that even in the establishment of PIMT, biological complications might occur. Hence, patient-, clinical-, and implant-related factors must be thoroughly explored.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Humans, Periodontal Diseases, Periodontitis, Dental Implants, Retrospective Studies, Peri-Implantitis
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	04 May 2017 09:44
Last Modified:	19 Jan 2023 07:06
DOI:	10.1038/sj.ebd.6401216
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3006911