Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth?

O'Connor, Anna R ORCID: 0000-0002-0376-9670 and Tidbury, Laurence P (2018) Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth? CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 101 (4). pp. 485-494.

Text O'Connor_et_al-2018-Clinical_and_Experimental_Optometry.pdf - Published version Download (676kB)

Abstract

The assessment of stereoacuity is an integral part of the ophthalmic assessment, with the responses used to inform clinical management decisions. Stereoacuity impacts on many aspects of life, but there are discrepancies reported where people without measurable stereoacuity report appreciating 3-D vision. This could be due, in part, to the presentation of the stimuli. A literature review was undertaken to evaluate current assessment techniques, how they relate to patient outcomes, identify the limitations of current tests and discuss how they could be improved. Recent evidence has been collated on currently available tests, used commonly within vision clinics, with normative data provided allowing responses to the tests to be interpreted. The relevance of the results is evaluated in relation to a range of outcomes, where a reduced level of stereopsis has a negative impact on the ability of an individual to perform many tasks, and can lead to an increase in difficulty interacting in the world. Current tests are limited in the aspects of stereoacuity they assess and their ability to precisely measure stereopsis. The world is not static, yet clinical tests are limited to measuring static stereoacuity, even though higher grades of depth perception can be identified in the presence of changing depth. Presentation methods of stereoacuity tests have remained similar over time, with a limited number of disparity levels assessed. New assessment methods are becoming available that include automated staircase testing to present multiple levels of disparity using digital technology. Current clinical tests are limited in their presentation, and are poor at detecting/measuring stereoacuity in those with limited stereopsis. Given the relevance of the stereoacuity measurement to management choices and functional outcomes, new testing methods would be beneficial to fully assess stereoacuity, both static and dynamic.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	binocular vision, motion in depth, stereoacuity, stereopsis, strabismus
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	09 Feb 2018 16:42
Last Modified:	19 Jan 2023 06:42
DOI:	10.1111/cxo.12655
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3017796