Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus


Ives, Jonathan, Dunn, Michael, Molewijk, Bert, Schildmann, Jan, Baeroe, Kristine, Frith, Lucy ORCID: 0000-0002-8506-0699, Huxtable, Richard, Landeweer, Elleke, Mertz, Marcel, Provoost, Veerle et al (show 6 more authors) (2018) Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 19 (1). 68-.

[img] Text
Ives et al 2018.pdf - Published version
Download (719kB)

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>This paper reports the process and outcome of a consensus finding project, which began with a meeting at the Brocher Foundation in May 2015. The project sought to generate and reach consensus on standards of practice for Empirical Bioethics research. The project involved 16 academics from 5 different European Countries, with a range of disciplinary backgrounds.<h4>Methods</h4>The consensus process used a modified Delphi approach.<h4>Results</h4>Consensus was reached on 15 standards of practice, organised into 6 domains of research practice (Aims, Questions, Integration, Conduct of Empirical Work, Conduct of Normative Work; Training & Expertise).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Through articulating these standards we outline a position that encourages responses, and through those responses we will be able to identify points of agreement and contestation that will drive the conversation forward. In that vein, we would encourage researchers, funders and journals to engage with what we have proposed, and respond to us, so that our community of practice of empirical bioethics research can develop and evolve further.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Empirical bioethics, Methods, Methodology, Standards, Consensus
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 06 Aug 2018 08:19
Last Modified: 19 Jan 2023 01:29
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0304-3
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3024640
Dimensions
Altmetric
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)