A Modest Classical Compatibilism



Hart, Matthew J
(2017) A Modest Classical Compatibilism. Disputatio, 9 (45). pp. 265-285.

[img] Text
[0873626X - Disputatio] A Modest Classical Compatibilism.pdf - Published version

Download (152kB) | Preview

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> The advent of Frankfurt-style counterexamples in the early 1970s posed a problem not merely for incompatibilists, but for compatibilists also. At that time compatibilists too were concerned to hold that the presence of alternative possibilities was necessary for moral responsibility. Such a classical compatibilism, I argue in this paper, should not have been left behind. I propose that we can use a Kratzer-style semantics of ‘can’ to model ‘could have done otherwise’ statements in such a way that the truth of such expressions is both (i) evidently consistent with determinism, and (ii) clearly such that Frankfurt-style counterexamples do not count as cases where the agent could not have done otherwise.</jats:p>

Item Type: Article
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 06 Aug 2019 09:15
Last Modified: 19 Jan 2023 00:36
DOI: 10.1515/disp-2017-0007
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3051101