Evans, Karen L 
ORCID: 0000-0002-1476-5130 and Montagnes, David JS ORCID: 0000-0001-8826-9837
(2019)
Freshwater sponge (Porifera: Spongillidae) distribution across a landscape: Environmental tolerances, habitats, and morphological variation.
Invertebrate Biology, 138 (3).
|
Text
Evans & Montagnes 2019 Invert Biol.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (980kB) | Preview |
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Freshwater sponges are important to ecosystem functioning; however, information about their biogeography and interspecific variation is fragmentary, limiting our ability to assess their role. Although the specific epithets of two common species suggest that sponges found in lentic habitats are <jats:italic>Spongilla lacustris</jats:italic>, and those found in lotic habitats are <jats:italic>Ephydatia fluviatilis</jats:italic>, the number of sponge species in the UK is unresolved. We sampled sponges in a variety of habitats and used both morphological and molecular (D3 domain of 28S rDNA) methods to identify six species, including the first record of <jats:italic>Trochospongilla horrida.</jats:italic> We contrasted species in terms of their environmental tolerances, habitats, and variation, and we expanded on the limited information available about the geographic distributions of these sponges. In our study, most sponge species colonized a variety of substrates, but exhibited different distributions. The most widespread sponge, <jats:italic>S</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>lacustris</jats:italic>, was present at lower mean water temperatures and was more often located above a latitude of 55°N. <jats:italic>Ephydatia fluviatilis</jats:italic> was the most common species in rivers, but was also located in lentic habitats. Salinity in anthropogenic habitats was not a significant factor for the presence of <jats:italic>E</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>fluviatilis</jats:italic> or the more patchily distributed species <jats:italic>Eunapius fragilis</jats:italic>. Instead, these species occurred more frequently at sites with negative oxidation–reduction potential. Sponge biodiversity may be affected by substrate availability in anthropogenic habitats, invasive species, and improved ability to recognize sponge taxa. Crucially, we provide foundation data as a prerequisite for future ecological evaluation.</jats:p>
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Jan 2020 11:35 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Nov 2023 06:47 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/ivb.12258 |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3054946 |
Dimensions
Dimensions
