The rejection of industrial democracy by Berle and Means and the emergence of the ideology of managerialism

Smith, Andrew ORCID: 0000-0002-8589-7608, Tennent, Kevin and Russell, Jason D (2022) The rejection of industrial democracy by Berle and Means and the emergence of the ideology of managerialism. ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY, 43 (1). pp. 98-122.

Text The Rejection of Industrial Democracy by Berle and Means and the Emergence of the Ideology of Managerialism for production process 30 September 2019.docx - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (75kB)

Abstract

<jats:p> One distinctive feature of the American variant of capitalism is the near absence of any of the industrial democracy institutions found in many European firms. This article examines ideology as a factor behind the absence of industrial democracy institutions in the United States. It focuses on the early 1930s, when the ideology of managerialism was being formulated by Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means, the authors of a book that had a well-documented influence on American business culture. As the article shows, many American firms in the 1910s and 1920s experimented with worker representation systems that contemporaries called industrial democracy. Berle and Means were aware of these moves to democratize the American workplace, but they rejected all forms of industrial democracy. The article advances an explanation for their rejection and thereby contributes to our understanding why the United States did not take the path towards democracy within companies. </jats:p>

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Employee participation, employee representation, industrial democracy, worker participation
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	19 Dec 2019 16:47
Last Modified:	19 Jan 2023 00:12
DOI:	10.1177/0143831X19883683
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3067115