Wilby, Martin John, Best, Ashley 
ORCID: 0000-0002-7268-8735, Wood, Eifiona, Burnside, Girvan ORCID: 0000-0001-7398-1346, Bedson, Emma, Short, Hannah, Wheatley, Dianne, Hill-McManus, Daniel, Sharma, Manohar, Clark, Simon et al (show 7 more authors)
(2021)
Surgical microdiscectomy versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc (NERVES): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.
LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY, 3 (5).
E347-E356.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>The optimal invasive treatment for sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc remains controversial, with a paucity of evidence for use of non-surgical treatments such as transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) over surgical microdiscectomy. We aimed to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of these options for management of radicular pain secondary to herniated lumbar disc.<h4>Methods</h4>We did a pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial at 11 spinal units across the UK. Eligible patients were aged 16-65 years, had MRI-confirmed non-emergency sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc with symptom duration between 6 weeks and 12 months, and had leg pain that was not responsive to non-invasive management. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either TFESI or surgical microdiscectomy by an online randomisation system that was stratified by centre with random permuted blocks. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) score at 18 weeks. All randomly assigned participants who completed a valid ODQ at baseline and at 18 weeks were included in the analysis. Safety analysis included all treated participants. Cost-effectiveness was estimated from the EuroQol-5D-5L, Hospital Episode Statistics, medication usage, and self-reported resource-use data. This trial was registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN04820368, and EudraCT, number 2014-002751-25.<h4>Findings</h4>Between March 6, 2015, and Dec 21, 2017, 163 (15%) of 1055 screened patients were enrolled, with 80 participants (49%) randomly assigned to the TFESI group and 83 participants (51%) to the surgery group. At week 18, ODQ scores were 30·02 (SD 24·38) for 63 assessed patients in the TFESI group and 22·30 (19·83) for 61 assessed patients in the surgery group. Mean improvement was 24·52 points (18·89) for the TFESI group and 26·74 points (21·35) for the surgery group, with an estimated treatment difference of -4·25 (95% CI -11·09 to 2·59; p=0·22). There were four serious adverse events in four participants associated with surgery, and none with TFESI. Compared with TFESI, surgery had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £38 737 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, and a 0·17 probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year.<h4>Interpretation</h4>For patients with sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc, with symptom duration of up to 12 months, TFESI should be considered as a first invasive treatment option. Surgery is unlikely to be a cost-effective alternative to TFESI.<h4>Funding</h4>Health Technology Assessment programme of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Comparative Effectiveness Research, Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Health Services, Neurosciences, Cost Effectiveness Research, Chronic Pain, Pain Research, Patient Safety, 6 Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions, 7 Management of diseases and conditions, 6.1 Pharmaceuticals, 6.4 Surgery, 7.3 Management and decision making, 3 Good Health and Well Being |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Clinical Directorate Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Jun 2021 15:38 |
| Last Modified: | 15 Mar 2024 02:52 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00036-9 |
| Open Access URL: | https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00036-9 |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3128308 |
Dimensions
Dimensions
