Is group work beneficial for producing creative designs in STEM design education?

Han, Ji ORCID: 0000-0003-3240-4942, Park, Dongmyung, Hua, Min and Childs, Peter RN (2022) Is group work beneficial for producing creative designs in STEM design education? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 32 (5). pp. 2801-2826.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Text Group Work and Design Creativity.docx - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (880kB)

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Creativity is a significant element in design education, and frequently a significant competency during recruitment for design professions. Group work and individual work are widely employed in higher education. Many studies have highlighted the merits of employing group work in design education, cultivating collaborative design abilities and fostering sought-after employability skills. Although the benefits of group work in design practice and education are widely recognised, few studies have shown evidence that group work outperforms individual work regarding creative design activities in higher education contexts. Therefore, the aim of this research is to explore whether group or individual work is more beneficial for fostering students in generating creative designs in STEM design education. A case study, involving two cohorts of second-year undergraduate students studying a UK Engineering degree Industrial Design programme, is reported. The case study compares the design outputs produced by the two cohorts tackling the same design challenge in a product design module but employing individual and group work, respectively. The case study results show that no significant differences have been found between the design outputs produced by group work and individual work, considering novelty, usefulness and overall creativity. Further analysis reveals that a student’s academic performance is not significantly related to the level of creativity of the design produced. This research indicates design educators should employ both group and individual work to complement each other in design education, and suggests potential solutions to enhance students’ design creativity.</jats:p>

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Design education, Group work, Individual work, Creativity, Idea generation, Idea evaluation, Idea selection
Divisions:	Faculty of Science and Engineering > School of Engineering
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	28 Sep 2021 07:22
Last Modified:	18 Jan 2023 21:28
DOI:	10.1007/s10798-021-09709-y
Open Access URL:	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10798...
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3138482