The ‘rhetorical concession’: a linguistic analysis of debates and arguments in mental health



Garner, Bethany, Kinderman, Peter ORCID: 0000-0001-8972-8548 and Davis, Phillip
(2022) The ‘rhetorical concession’: a linguistic analysis of debates and arguments in mental health. Journal of Mental Health. pp. 1-6.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

We, the editors and publisher of <i>Journal of Mental Health</i>, have retracted the following article: Garner, B., Kinderman, P., & Davis, P. (2021). 'The "rhetorical concession": a linguistic analysis of debates and arguments in mental health', DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2021.2022631Since publication, a conflict of interest has been brought to our attention. Blog 'F', which is one of a series of blogs analysed in this paper, has been identified as the blog of Peter Kinderman, co-author of the paper. This conflict of interest was not disclosed upon submission of the article, and we consequently believe that this compromises the reliability of the reviews and the paper's findings. We are therefore retracting the article.Our decision has been informed by our policy on publishing ethics and integrity and the COPE guidelines on retractions. The retracted article will remain online to maintain the scholarly record, but it will be digitally watermarked on each page as 'Retracted'. .

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Mental Health, 8 Health and social care services research, 8.3 Policy, ethics, and research governance, 3 Good Health and Well Being
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 24 Jan 2022 10:52
Last Modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:36
DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2021.2022631
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.2022631
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3147541