Can IDEXX Angio Detect™ accurately detect canine Angiostrongylosis?



Weir, Natashia ORCID: 0000-0003-1506-1669 and Ireland, Jo ORCID: 0000-0002-5737-1502
(2021) Can IDEXX Angio Detect™ accurately detect canine Angiostrongylosis? Veterinary Evidence, 6 (4).

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

<jats:p>PICO question&#x0D; In dogs, is IDEXX Angio Detect™ as accurate as Baermann coprology when diagnosing Angiostrongylus vasorum infection?&#x0D;  &#x0D; Clinical bottom line&#x0D; Category of research question&#x0D; Diagnosis&#x0D; The number and type of study designs reviewed&#x0D; Eight papers were critically reviewed: three diagnostic accuracy studies, two cross-sectional studies (one of which also included a retrospective case series), one cohort study, one case-control study, and one case series&#x0D; Strength of evidence&#x0D; Weak&#x0D; Outcomes reported&#x0D; Angio Detect™ (IDEXX) was shown to have low-moderate sensitivity and high specificity in comparison to Baermann coprology. Occasionally, false-negative results occurred with Angio Detect™ when compared to Baermann coprology. This was thought to be due to antigen-antibody complex formation. Positive Angio Detect™ assays were obtained in both symptomatic and asymptomatic canine patients. In an experimental setting, Angio Detect™ was shown to obtain a positive result five weeks post-inoculation&#x0D; Conclusion&#x0D; There is weak evidence supporting Angio Detect™ as a highly specific and moderately sensitive diagnostic test when compared to Baermann coprology&#x0D;  &#x0D; How to apply this evidence in practice&#x0D; The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.&#x0D; Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.&#x0D;  &#x0D; </jats:p>

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Clinical Research, Vaccine Related, Biodefense, Prevention, 4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies, 4 Detection, screening and diagnosis
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 03 Feb 2022 13:53
Last Modified: 27 Apr 2024 18:45
DOI: 10.18849/ve.v6i4.515
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v6i4.515
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3148126