Identification of Digital Health Priorities for Palliative Care Research: Modified Delphi Study



Nwosu, Amara Callistus ORCID: 0000-0003-0014-3741, McGlinchey, Tamsin, Sanders, Justin, Stanley, Sarah, Palfrey, Jennifer, Lubbers, Patrick, Chapman, Laura, Finucane, Anne and Mason, Stephen ORCID: 0000-0002-4020-6869
(2022) Identification of Digital Health Priorities for Palliative Care Research: Modified Delphi Study. JMIR AGING, 5 (1). e32075-.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>Developments in digital health have the potential to transform the delivery of health and social care to help citizens manage their health. Currently, there is a lack of consensus about digital health research priorities in palliative care and a lack of theories about how these technologies might improve care outcomes. Therefore, it is important for health care leaders to identify innovations to ensure that an increasingly frail population has appropriate access to palliative care services. Consequently, it is important to articulate research priorities as the first step in determining how finite resources should be allocated to a field saturated with rapidly developing innovation.<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of this study is to identify research priority areas for digital health in palliative care.<h4>Methods</h4>We selected digital health trends, most relevant to palliative care, from a list of emerging trends reported by a leading institute of quantitative futurists. We conducted 2 rounds of the Delphi questionnaire, followed by a consensus meeting and public engagement workshop to establish a final consensus on research priorities for digital technology in palliative care. We used the views of public representatives to gain their perspectives on the agreed priorities.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 103 experts (representing 11 countries) participated in the first Delphi round. Of the 103 experts, 55 (53.3%) participated in the second round. The final consensus meetings were attended by 10.7% (11/103) of the experts. We identified 16 priority areas, which involved many applications of technologies, including care for patients and caregivers, self-management and reporting of diseases, education and training, communication, care coordination, and research methodology. We summarized the priority areas into eight topics: big data, mobile devices, telehealth and telemedicine, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, smart home, biotechnology, and digital legacy.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The priorities identified in this study represent a wide range of important emerging areas in the fields of digital health, personalized medicine, and data science. Human-centered design and robust governance systems should be considered in future research. It is important that the risks of using these technologies in palliative care are properly addressed to ensure that these tools are used meaningfully, wisely, and safely and do not cause unintentional harm.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: palliative care, terminal care, supportive care, quality of life, symptom management, digital health, technology
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 06 May 2022 16:12
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2023 21:04
DOI: 10.2196/32075
Open Access URL: https://aging.jmir.org/2022/1/e32075
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3154406