Shi, Chunhu, Goodall, Mark 
ORCID: 0000-0002-4880-998X, Dumville, Jo, Hill, James, Norman, Gill, Hamer, Oliver, Clegg, Andrew, Watkins, Caroline Leigh, Georgiou, George, Hodkinson, Alexander et al (show 3 more authors)
(2022)
The accuracy of pulse oximetry in measuring oxygen saturation by levels of skin pigmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC MEDICINE, 20 (1).
267-.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>During the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been concerns regarding potential bias in pulse oximetry measurements for people with high levels of skin pigmentation. We systematically reviewed the effects of skin pigmentation on the accuracy of oxygen saturation measurement by pulse oximetry (SpO<sub>2</sub>) compared with the gold standard SaO<sub>2</sub> measured by CO-oximetry.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (up to December 2021) for studies with SpO<sub>2</sub>-SaO<sub>2</sub> comparisons and measuring the impact of skin pigmentation or ethnicity on pulse oximetry accuracy. We performed meta-analyses for mean bias (the primary outcome in this review) and its standard deviations (SDs) across studies included for each subgroup of skin pigmentation and ethnicity and used these pooled mean biases and SDs to calculate accuracy root-mean-square (A<sub>rms</sub>) and 95% limits of agreement. The review was registered with the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/gm7ty ).<h4>Results</h4>We included 32 studies (6505 participants): 15 measured skin pigmentation and 22 referred to ethnicity. Compared with standard SaO<sub>2</sub> measurement, pulse oximetry probably overestimates oxygen saturation in people with the high level of skin pigmentation (pooled mean bias 1.11%; 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 1.93%) and people described as Black/African American (1.52%; 0.95 to 2.09%) (moderate- and low-certainty evidence). The bias of pulse oximetry measurements for people with other levels of skin pigmentation or those from other ethnic groups is either more uncertain or suggests no overestimation. Whilst the extent of mean bias is small or negligible for all subgroups evaluated, the associated imprecision is unacceptably large (pooled SDs > 1%). When the extent of measurement bias and precision is considered jointly, pulse oximetry measurements for all the subgroups appear acceptably accurate (with A<sub>rms</sub> < 4%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Pulse oximetry may overestimate oxygen saturation in people with high levels of skin pigmentation and people whose ethnicity is reported as Black/African American, compared with SaO<sub>2</sub>. The extent of overestimation may be small in hospital settings but unknown in community settings. REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/gm7ty.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Pulse oximetry, Arterial blood oxygen saturation, Measurement bias, Skin pigmentation, Ethnicity, Systematic review |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Sep 2022 10:00 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Jan 2023 20:45 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12916-022-02452-8 |
| Open Access URL: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02452-8 |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3164352 |
Dimensions
Dimensions
