Uses and abuses of the neuropsychological assessment in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy surgery candidates.



Baxendale, Sallie ORCID: 0000-0002-9930-6469 and Baker, Gus A
(2022) Uses and abuses of the neuropsychological assessment in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy surgery candidates. Epilepsy & behavior reports, 18. 100507-.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

Recent guidelines from the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) delineating the role of the neuropsychologist in the assessment of epilepsy surgery patients stress the collaborative contribution neuropsychologists should make to seizure characterization, lateralization and localization in the pre-surgical setting. The role they should play in the comprehensive counselling of surgical candidates, including exploration of the patient's expectations of surgical treatment is also mandated. In this paper we present two contrasting case studies which illustrate the importance of these roles and the impact they can have on patient outcomes. In Case A we describe the patient journey of a 69-year-old women with left hippocampal sclerosis and concordant neurophysiology and seizure semiology. We present the series of discussions and decisions which led her to reject the surgical option following a detailed exploration of her motivations for surgery and the likely cognitive consequences of the procedure. In Case B we describe the series of errors and omissions which led to the failure of a clinical team to correctly interpret and integrate neuropsychological findings into the larger clinical picture of a 19-year-old woman with a seven year history of seizures. These errors ultimately culminated in the patient undergoing a right temporal lobe resection to treat psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). The extent of integration of the data from the clinical neuropsychological assessment in the full presurgical evaluation was critical in determining the outcomes in both of these cases. Surgery did not solve Case B's problems and left her with the lifelong cognitive vulnerabilities that are associated with unilateral temporal lobe resection. In contrast, Case A was a good surgical candidate, but comprehensive integration of the neuropsychological findings into the larger clinical picture established that surgery was not the best solution to the problem she wished to solve.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Epilepsy surgery, Informed consent, Memory, Neuropsychology
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 28 Oct 2022 15:17
Last Modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:23
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100507
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100507
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3165864