Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) mainstream or unconventional option? Study exploring the impact of COVID-19 on paediatric dentists' views and practices of MID for managing carious primary teeth in children across the United Kingdom and European Union



BaniHani, A, Hamid, A, Van Eeckhoven, J, Gizani, S and Albadri, S ORCID: 0000-0001-6516-9497
(2022) Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) mainstream or unconventional option? Study exploring the impact of COVID-19 on paediatric dentists' views and practices of MID for managing carious primary teeth in children across the United Kingdom and European Union. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 23 (5). pp. 835-844.

[img] PDF
Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) mainstream or unconventional option Study exploring the impact of COVID-19 on paediatri.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript

Download (806kB) | Preview

Abstract

<h4>Purpose</h4>To explore the techniques used to manage carious primary teeth during the COVID-19 pandemic by paediatric dentists and dentists with a special interest in paediatric dentistry (DwSI) who are members of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry (BSPD) and the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD), and their views on the use of minimal intervention dentistry (MID) in children prior to, during and post the COVID era.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 212 paediatric dentists and DwSI completed an online questionnaire. Six MID techniques were explored: fissure sealants, resin infiltration, Hall Technique (HT), 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF), atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), stepwise removal and selective caries removal.<h4>Results</h4>The majority were specialists (26%) followed by clinical academics (23.1%) working mainly in university teaching hospitals (46.2%). Routine dental treatment for children with carious primary teeth was provided by the majority (92.5%) during the pandemic. HT (96%) and 38% SDF (65.7%) were the most commonly used techniques among the BSPD members whereas conventional restoration of non-selective caries removal and pulp therapy remained the most widely used technique among the EAPD members (66.2%). Most of the MID techniques were used as a treatment option (48.1%) rather than a choice (43.4%), with most of these choices having been affected by the patient's behaviour (82.5%). More than one thirds (39.2%) of the participants were reluctant to adopt MID after the pandemic. Several barriers such as lack of teaching and confidence as well as perceived lack of evidence were identified.<h4>Conclusion</h4>A range of MID techniques is practiced broadly by a sample of paediatric dentists and DwSI across the United Kingdom (U.K) and European Union (E.U). The majority of clinicians are willing to continue using these techniques going forward after COVID restrictions are lifted. The pandemic served as an opportunity for many dentists to become familiar with various MID practices, such as SDF, which has been already established some time ago.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: COVID-19, Minimal intervention dentistry, Hall technique, Silver diamine fluoride, Dental caries, Primary teeth, Paediatric dentists, Oral healthcare for children
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences > School of Dentistry
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 06 Jan 2023 09:50
Last Modified: 06 Jan 2023 09:50
DOI: 10.1007/s40368-022-00746-2
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3166802