Salines, Morgane, Lazou, Thomai, Gomez-Luengo, Jose, Holthe, Janne, Nastasijevic, Ivan, Bouwknegt, Martijn, Dadios, Nikolaos, Houf, Kurt, Blagojevic, Bojan and Antic, Dragan 
ORCID: 0000-0003-1301-2732
(2023)
Risk categorisation of abattoirs in Europe: Current state of play.
FOOD CONTROL, 152.
p. 109863.
Abstract
In the last decades, a risk-based approach has been identified as a step forward in modernising meat safety system in Europe. Risk categorisation of abattoirs based on their process hygiene and the appropriate use of harmonised epidemiological indicators (HEIs) has been suggested as one essential component of the risk-based meat safety assurance system. However, to date, only a limited number of papers have investigated abattoir risk categorisation. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (i) provide an overview of the use of risk categorisation systems in poultry, pig, cattle and small ruminant abattoirs in Europe and (ii) explore the criteria, relevance and applicability of risk categorisation systems for competent authorities (CAs). To that aim, a questionnaire was designed and sent to representatives of 35 European CAs. Of the 18/35 respondents (51%), 14 (78%) indicated that abattoirs in their country are categorised according to their food safety risk in a systematic way, whilst four countries (22%) do not categorise abattoirs according to their food safety risk. The main reported purpose of categorising abattoirs is to adapt the frequency of official controls. Major differences in the described categorisation systems were found between countries, particularly in their complexity and the criteria used. The number of included criteria ranged from 1 to 10, the main ones being the outcomes of the CA's official audits (78% of the 14 countries), the size of abattoirs (64%), the relevance and credibility of HACCP plans (57%) and export agreements of abattoirs (43%). Less than a third of the surveyed countries indicated they utilise results of microbiological testing as a basis for risk categorisation of abattoirs, and no country has formally included HEIs in its risk categorisation system. The effectiveness of the implemented risk categorisation systems was assessed in five countries only (36%), but with the use of unclear methodology and assessment criteria. More than 80% of respondents expressed their wish to be provided with a practical method for categorising abattoirs according to their pertained food safety risks. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate the need to develop a fit-for-purpose and science-based framework for risk categorisation of abattoirs in Europe.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Risk categorisation, Meat safety assurance, Meat inspection, Abattoir, Process hygiene, Carcass |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 16 May 2023 13:40 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Jun 2023 12:20 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109863 |
| Open Access URL: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/... |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3170401 |
Dimensions
Dimensions
