Chipanta, David, Kapambwe, Sharon, Nyondo-Mipando, Alinane Linda, Pascoe, Margaret, Amo-Agyei, Silas, Bohlius, Julia, Estill, Janne and Keiser, Olivia
(2023)
Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys.
BMJ open, 13 (6).
e067948-e067948.
|
Text
bmj open cervical.pdf - Open Access published version Download (998kB) | Preview |
Abstract
<h4>Objectives</h4>We examined age, residence, education and wealth inequalities and their combinations on cervical precancer screening probabilities for women. We hypothesised that inequalities in screening favoured women who were older, lived in urban areas, were more educated and wealthier.<h4>Design</h4>Cross-sectional study using Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment data.<h4>Setting</h4>Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Differences in screening rates were analysed using multivariable logistic regressions, controlling for age, residence, education and wealth. Inequalities in screening probability were estimated using marginal effects models.<h4>Participants</h4>Women aged 25-49 years, reporting screening.<h4>Outcome measures</h4>Self-reported screening rates, and their inequalities in percentage points, with differences of 20%+ defined as high inequality, 5%-20% as medium, 0%-5% as low.<h4>Results</h4>The sample size of participants ranged from 5882 in Ethiopia to 9186 in Tanzania. The screening rates were low in the surveyed countries, ranging from 3.5% (95% CI 3.1% to 4.0%) in Rwanda to 17.1% (95% CI 15.8% to 18.5%) and 17.4% (95% CI 16.1% to 18.8%) in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Inequalities in screening rates were low based on covariates. Combining the inequalities led to significant inequalities in screening probabilities between women living in rural areas aged 25-34 years, with a primary education level, from the lowest wealth quintile, and women living in urban areas aged 35-49 years, with the highest education level, from the highest wealth quintile, ranging from 4.4% in Rwanda to 44.6% in Zimbabwe.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Cervical precancer screening rates were inequitable and low. No country surveyed achieved one-third of the WHO's target of screening 70% of eligible women by 2030. Combining inequalities led to high inequalities, preventing women who were younger, lived in rural areas, were uneducated, and from the lowest wealth quintile from screening. Governments should include and monitor equity in their cervical precancer screening programmes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Cancer pain, HIV & AIDS, PUBLIC HEALTH, Health policy, Health economics, Reproductive medicine |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Jun 2023 10:41 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Aug 2023 10:53 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067948 |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3171270 |
Dimensions
Dimensions
