Kirkwood, Betty R, Sikander, Siham, Roy, Reetabrata, Soremekun, Seyi, Bhopal, Sunil S, Avan, Bilal, Lingam, Raghu, Gram, Lu, Amenga-Etego, Seeba, Khan, Bushra et al (show 12 more authors)
(2023)
Effect of the SPRING home visits intervention on early child development and growth in rural India and Pakistan: parallel cluster randomised controlled trials.
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 10.
1155763-.
Abstract
<h4>Introduction</h4>Almost 250 million children fail to achieve their full growth or developmental potential, trapping them in a cycle of continuing disadvantage. Strong evidence exists that parent-focussed face to face interventions can improve developmental outcomes; the challenge is delivering these on a wide scale. SPRING (Sustainable Programme Incorporating Nutrition and Games) aimed to address this by developing a feasible affordable programme of monthly home visits by community-based workers (CWs) and testing two different delivery models at scale in a programmatic setting. In Pakistan, SPRING was embedded into existing monthly home visits of Lady Health Workers (LHWs). In India, it was delivered by a civil society/non-governmental organisation (CSO/NGO) that trained a new cadre of CWs.<h4>Methods</h4>The SPRING interventions were evaluated through parallel cluster randomised trials. In Pakistan, clusters were 20 Union Councils (UCs), and in India, the catchment areas of 24 health sub-centres. Trial participants were mother-baby dyads of live born babies recruited through surveillance systems of 2 monthly home visits. Primary outcomes were BSID-III composite scores for psychomotor, cognitive and language development plus height for age <i>z</i>-score (HAZ), assessed at 18 months of age. Analyses were by intention to treat.<h4>Results</h4>1,443 children in India were assessed at age 18 months and 1,016 in Pakistan. There was no impact in either setting on ECD outcomes or growth. The percentage of children in the SPRING intervention group who were receiving diets at 12 months of age that met the WHO minimum acceptable criteria was 35% higher in India (95% CI: 4-75%, <i>p</i> = 0.023) and 45% higher in Pakistan (95% CI: 15-83%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) compared to children in the control groups.<h4>Discussion</h4>The lack of impact is explained by shortcomings in implementation factors. Important lessons were learnt. Integrating additional tasks into the already overloaded workload of CWs is unlikely to be successful without additional resources and re-organisation of their goals to include the new tasks. The NGO model is the most likely for scale-up as few countries have established infrastructures like the LHW programme. It will require careful attention to the establishment of strong administrative and management systems to support its implementation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | early child development (ECD), child growth and nutrition, home visits, nurturing care, cluster randomised control trial, community health worker (CHW), India, Pakistan |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 10 Jul 2023 13:37 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Jul 2023 18:54 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1155763 |
| Open Access URL: | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1155763 |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3171562 |
Dimensions
Dimensions
