Detecting individual preferences and erroneous verdicts in mixed martial arts judging using Bayesian hierarchical models



Holmes, Benjamin ORCID: 0000-0003-1227-6795, Mchale, Ian G ORCID: 0000-0002-7686-3879 and Zychaluk, Kamila
(2024) Detecting individual preferences and erroneous verdicts in mixed martial arts judging using Bayesian hierarchical models. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 312 (2). pp. 733-745.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

In this paper, we use Bayesian hierarchical models to investigate the decision-making of judges of mixed martial arts (MMA) contests. Whilst there has been research into the judging of various sports in the past, none have explicitly modelled the judges’ behaviours at an individual level. We progress the literature by demonstrating that judges have personal preferences towards the different actions that they must assess during a fight. The preferences themselves may be the deciding factor in a bout, as demonstrated using a historical case study. We apply the concept of variable significance to the predictions of scores, to assess whether a judge's verdict was within reason. Finally, we develop a model that predicts a bout's fair outcome, which could be used in various ways in MMA.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: OR in sports, Biases, Mixed martial arts, Bayesian statistics, Hierarchical model
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Management
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 28 Jul 2023 15:01
Last Modified: 27 Nov 2023 05:16
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.07.004
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.07.004
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3171986