Ochomo, Eric, Rund, Samuel SC, Mthawanji, Rosheen S 
ORCID: 0000-0003-0430-0417, Antonio-Nkondjio, Christophe, Machani, Maxwell, Samake, Siriman, Wolie, Rosine Z, Nsango, Sandrine, Lown, Laurel Anne, Matoke-Muhia, Damaris et al (show 17 more authors)
(2024)
Mosquito control by abatement programmes in the United States: perspectives and lessons for countries in sub-Saharan Africa.
Malaria journal, 23 (1).
p. 8.
|
Text
Mosquito control by abatement programmes in the United States perspectives and lessons for countries in sub-Saharan Africa.pdf - Open Access published version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Africa and the United States are both large, heterogeneous geographies with a diverse range of ecologies, climates and mosquito species diversity which contribute to disease transmission and nuisance biting. In the United States, mosquito control is nationally, and regionally coordinated and in so much as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) provides guidance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides pesticide registration, and the states provide legal authority and oversight, the implementation is usually decentralized to the state, county, or city level. Mosquito control operations are organized, in most instances, into fully independent mosquito abatement districts, public works departments, local health departments. In some cases, municipalities engage independent private contractors to undertake mosquito control within their jurisdictions. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where most vector-borne disease endemic countries lie, mosquito control is organized centrally at the national level. In this model, the disease control programmes (national malaria control programmes or national malaria elimination programmes (NMCP/NMEP)) are embedded within the central governments' ministries of health (MoHs) and drive vector control policy development and implementation. Because of the high disease burden and limited resources, the primary endpoint of mosquito control in these settings is reduction of mosquito borne diseases, primarily, malaria. In the United States, however, the endpoint is mosquito control, therefore, significant (or even greater) emphasis is laid on nuisance mosquitoes as much as disease vectors. The authors detail experiences and learnings gathered by the delegation of African vector control professionals that participated in a formal exchange programme initiated by the Pan-African Mosquito Control Association (PAMCA), the University of Notre Dame, and members of the American Mosquito Control Association (AMCA), in the United States between the year 2021 and 2022. The authors highlight the key components of mosquito control operations in the United States and compare them to mosquito control programmes in SSA countries endemic for vector-borne diseases, deriving important lessons that could be useful for vector control in SSA.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Animals, Malaria, Ecology, Disease Vectors, Mosquito Control, Africa South of the Sahara, United States, Mosquito Vectors |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Jan 2024 09:36 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Feb 2024 16:03 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12936-023-04829-3 |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3177873 |
Dimensions
Dimensions
