Acceptance of and Adherence to a Four-Dose RTS,S/AS01 Schedule: Findings from a Longitudinal Qualitative Evaluation Study for the Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme.



Price, Jessica, Gurley, Nikki ORCID: 0000-0003-3190-200X, Gyapong, Margaret, Ansah, Evelyn Korkor, Awusabo-Asare, Kofi, Gyasi, Samuel Fosu, Nkhoma, Pearson ORCID: 0000-0002-0822-424X, Nyondo-Mipando, Alinane Linda, Okello, George ORCID: 0000-0002-6263-1858, Webster, Jayne ORCID: 0000-0002-0498-8883
et al (show 3 more authors) (2023) Acceptance of and Adherence to a Four-Dose RTS,S/AS01 Schedule: Findings from a Longitudinal Qualitative Evaluation Study for the Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme. Vaccines, 11 (12). 1801-.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>The WHO recommended the use of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine (RTS,S) based on a pilot evaluation in routine use in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi. A longitudinal qualitative study was conducted to examine facilitators and barriers to uptake of a 4-dose RTS,S schedule.<h4>Methods</h4>A cohort of 198 caregivers of RTS,S-eligible children from communities where RTS,S was provided through the pilot were interviewed three times over a ≈22-month, 4-dose schedule. The interviews examined caregiver perceptions and behaviors. Children's vaccination history was obtained to determine dose uptake.<h4>Results</h4>162 caregivers remained at round 3 (R3); vaccination history was available for 152/162 children. Despite early rumors/fears, the uptake of initial doses was high, driven by vaccine trust. Fears dissipated by R2, replaced with an enthusiasm for RTS,S as caregivers perceived its safety and less frequent and severe malaria. By R3, 98/152 children had received four doses; 34 three doses; 9 one or two doses; and 11 zero doses. The health system and information barriers were important across all under-dose cases. Fears about AEFIs/safety were important in zero-, one-, and two-dose cases. Competing life/livelihood demands and complacency were found in three-dose cases. Regardless of the doses received, caregivers had positive attitudes towards RTS,S by R3.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Findings from our study will help countries newly introducing the vaccine to anticipate and preempt reasons for delayed acceptance and missed RTS,S doses.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: malaria vaccine pilot evaluation, vaccine acceptance, vaccine trust, vaccine uptake barriers
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 30 Jan 2024 10:21
Last Modified: 30 Jan 2024 10:59
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11121801
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11121801
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3178093