Etanercept originator versus etanercept biosimilar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as a first biologic: results from the BSRBR-RA



Kearsley-Fleet, Lianne, Rokad, Aasiyah, Tsoi, Man-Fung, Zhao, Sizheng Steven ORCID: 0000-0002-3558-7353, Lunt, Mark, Watson, Kath D and Hyrich, Kimme L
(2023) Etanercept originator versus etanercept biosimilar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as a first biologic: results from the BSRBR-RA. RHEUMATOLOGY, 62 (12). pp. 3849-3857.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

<h4>Objectives</h4>Etanercept biosimilars show comparable efficacy to their originators among biologic-naïve patients with RA in randomized controlled trials. Nationwide guidelines have obligated prescribing of etanercept biosimilars from 2016, resulting in significant cost savings. This analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of etanercept originator vs etanercept biosimilar amongst biologic-naïve RA patients treated in routine clinical practice in the UK.<h4>Methods</h4>Biologic-naïve RA patients starting etanercept in the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Rhematoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA) cohort study from 2010 were included. Data collected at start of therapy includes patient demographics and disease activity. Follow-up data includes changes in disease activity and anti-rheumatic therapy. Six- and 12-month primary outcomes include DAS for 28-joints (DAS28) remission, EULAR response and minimal clinically important difference in function. Etanercept drug survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression, including reasons for treatment withdrawal. Multiple imputation accounted for missing data. Propensity-decile adjustment was used to account for confounding by indication.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 1806 biologic-naïve RA patients started etanercept: 1009 originator, 797 biosimilar. At 6 and 12 months, the proportion of patients achieving DAS28 remission and EULAR response were similar between treatments. During follow-up, 19% of originator patients switched onto etanercept biosimilar. Patients were censored at time of switch. Patients on originator were no more likely to stop therapy vs biosimilar; 71% of originator and 76% of biosimilar patients remained on therapy at 1 year.<h4>Conclusions</h4>In one of the largest analyses of patients with RA, biologic-naïve RA patients treated with etanercept originator showed similar outcomes vs biosimilar using real-world data. Drug survival, and disease activity after 6 and 12 months of therapy, was similar between cohorts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biologic therapy, biosimilar, disease activity, epidemiology, originator, outcomes, RA
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 31 Jan 2024 10:09
Last Modified: 31 Jan 2024 10:09
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead127
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead127
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3178158