Teodorowski, Piotr, Gleason, Kelly, Gregory, Jonathan J, Martin, Martha, Punjabi, Reshma, Steer, Suzanne, Savasir, Serdar, Vema, Pournamy, Murray, Kabelo, Ward, Helen et al (show 1 more authors)
(2023)
Participatory evaluation of the process of co-producing resources for the public on data science and artificial intelligence.
Research involvement and engagement, 9 (1).
p. 67.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>The growth of data science and artificial intelligence offers novel healthcare applications and research possibilities. Patients should be able to make informed choices about using healthcare. Therefore, they must be provided with lay information about new technology. A team consisting of academic researchers, health professionals, and public contributors collaboratively co-designed and co-developed the new resource offering that information. In this paper, we evaluate this novel approach to co-production.<h4>Methods</h4>We used participatory evaluation to understand the co-production process. This consisted of creative approaches and reflexivity over three stages. Firstly, everyone had an opportunity to participate in three online training sessions. The first one focused on the aims of evaluation, the second on photovoice (that included practical training on using photos as metaphors), and the third on being reflective (recognising one's biases and perspectives during analysis). During the second stage, using photovoice, everyone took photos that symbolised their experiences of being involved in the project. This included a session with a professional photographer. At the last stage, we met in person and, using data collected from photovoice, built the mandala as a representation of a joint experience of the project. This stage was supported by professional artists who summarised the mandala in the illustration.<h4>Results</h4>The mandala is the artistic presentation of the findings from the evaluation. It is a shared journey between everyone involved. We divided it into six related layers. Starting from inside layers present the following experiences (1) public contributors had space to build confidence in a new topic, (2) relationships between individuals and within the project, (3) working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, (4) motivation that influenced people to become involved in this particular piece of work, (5) requirements that co-production needs to be inclusive and accessible to everyone, (6) expectations towards data science and artificial intelligence that researchers should follow to establish public support.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The participatory evaluation suggests that co-production around data science and artificial intelligence can be a meaningful process that is co-owned by everyone involved.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | AI, Background, Co-production, Data science, Evaluation, Photovoice |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Feb 2024 11:26 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Feb 2024 11:26 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s40900-023-00480-z |
| Open Access URL: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00480-z |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3178264 |
Dimensions
Dimensions
