An NHS Trust comparison of reporting radiographers and consultant radiologists ability to identify cancer on chest radiographs with confirmation through a Fast track CT thorax referral system.

Trivett, E and MacKay, S ORCID: 0000-0002-3451-6676 (2024) An NHS Trust comparison of reporting radiographers and consultant radiologists ability to identify cancer on chest radiographs with confirmation through a Fast track CT thorax referral system. Radiography (London, England : 1995), 30 (3). pp. 821-826.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.03.003

Abstract

<h4>Introduction</h4>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that GPs initially refer patients with suspected lung cancer for a chest X-ray (CXR). The Radiology department has a 'fast track system' to identify those patients who may have lung cancer on CXR and are referred for a CT thorax with contrast to help determine a cancer diagnosis. This fast track system was put in place to ensure the NICE guidelines and NHS England's standards on a faster cancer diagnosis are being met. This audit studied the ability of radiologists and reporting radiographers to identify lung cancer on CXRs and the accuracy of the fast-track system.<h4>Methods</h4>846 cases with lung alerts were analysed and 545 CXRs were audited. The CXRs were split into images reported by radiologists (168) and those reported by reporting radiographers (377). CT thorax results were collected through PACS and Cerner computer systems to identify if the 'fast track' system had yielded a "positive", "negative", or "other findings" result for lung cancer.<h4>Results</h4>32.8% (179) of CXRs flagged for lung cancer were positive, 40.6% (221) were negative, and 26.6% (145) had other findings. Chi square statistical test showed no significant difference (p = 0.14) between the two reporting groups in their ability to identify lung cancer on CXRs. 27% (38) of CXRs flagged by radiologists and 35% (125) by reporting radiographers were positive for lung cancer.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This clinical audit indicates, reporting radiographers and radiologists are not statistically significantly different regarding their ability to identify lung cancer on CXRs, when supported by the fast track system. The fast-track system had a 59.4 % accuracy rate, detected by the number of imaging of reports that identified a serious pathology. This concludes that the system is performing well, yet could still be improved.<h4>Implications for practice</h4>This audit provides further evidence for the value of developing and deploying reporting radiographers for projection radiography reporting.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Chest X-ray, Fast-track system, Lung cancer
Divisions:	Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health > School of Health Sciences
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	18 Apr 2024 10:52
Last Modified:	18 Apr 2024 10:52
DOI:	10.1016/j.radi.2024.03.003
Open Access URL:	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.03.003
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3180431