Ambridge, Ben ORCID: 0000-0003-2389-8477, Bidgood, Amy ORCID: 0000-0002-9719-4256, Pine, Julian ORCID: 0000-0002-7077-9713, Rowland, Caroline and Freudenthal, Daniel
(2016)
Is Passive Syntax Semantically Constrained? Evidence From Adult Grammaticality Judgment and Comprehension Studies.
Cognitive Science, 40 (06).
pp. 1435-1459.
Text
Ambridge_et_al-Cognitive_Science.pdf - Unspecified Access to this file is embargoed until Unspecified. Download (302kB) |
Abstract
To explain the phenomenon that certain English verbs resist passivization (e.g., *£5 was cost by the book), Pinker (1989) proposed a semantic constraint on the passive in the adult grammar: The greater the extent to which a verb denotes an action where a patient is affected or acted upon, the greater the extent to which it is compatible with the passive. However, a number of comprehension and production priming studies have cast doubt upon this claim, finding no difference between highly affecting agent-patient/theme-experiencer passives (e.g., Wendy was kicked/frightened by Bob) and non-actional experiencer theme passives (e.g., Wendy was heard by Bob). The present study provides evidence that a semantic constraint is psychologically real, and is readily observed when more fine-grained independent and dependent measures are used (i.e., participant ratings of verb semantics, graded grammaticality judgments, and reaction time in a forced-choice picture-matching comprehension task). We conclude that a semantic constraint on the passive must be incorporated into accounts of the adult grammar.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Child language acquisition, Passive, Verb, Semantics, Autonomy of syntax, Theme-experiencer, Experiencer-theme, Agent-patient |
Subjects: | ?? BF ?? ?? P1 ?? ?? PE ?? |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
Date Deposited: | 09 Feb 2016 16:09 |
Last Modified: | 15 Dec 2022 21:34 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cogs.12277 |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/2050521 |