Follow-on RifAximin for the Prevention of recurrence following standard treatment of Infection with <i>Clostridium Difficile</i> (RAPID): a randomised placebo controlled trial



Major, Giles, Bradshaw, Lucy, Boota, Nafisa, Sprange, Kirsty, Diggle, Mathew, Montgomery, Alan, Jawhari, Aida, Spiller, Robin C, Bradshaw, Lucy, Boota, Nafisa
et al (show 241 more authors) (2019) Follow-on RifAximin for the Prevention of recurrence following standard treatment of Infection with <i>Clostridium Difficile</i> (RAPID): a randomised placebo controlled trial. GUT, 68 (7). pp. 1224-1231.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.
[img] Text
1224.full.pdf - Published version

Download (516kB) | Preview

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) recurs after initial treatment in approximately one in four patients. A single-centre pilot study suggested that this could be reduced using 'follow-on' rifaximin treatment. We aimed to assess the efficacy of rifaximin treatment in preventing recurrence.<h4>Methods</h4>A multisite, parallel group, randomised, placebo controlled trial recruiting patients aged ≥18 years immediately after resolution of CDI through treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin. Participants received either rifaximin 400 mg three times a day for 2 weeks, reduced to 200 mg three times a day for a further 2 weeks or identical placebo. The primary endpoint was recurrence of CDI within 12 weeks of trial entry.<h4>Results</h4>Between December 2012 and March 2016, 151 participants were randomised to either rifaximin or placebo. Primary outcome data were available on 130. Mean age was 71.9 years (SD 15.3). Recurrence within 12 weeks was 29.5% (18/61) among participants allocated to placebo compared with 15.9% (11/69) among those allocated to rifaximin, a difference between groups of 13.7% (95% CI -28.1% to 0.7%, p=0.06). The risk ratio was 0.54 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.05, p=0.07). During 6-month safety follow-up, nine participants died in each group (12%). Adverse event rates were similar between groups.<h4>Conclusion</h4>While 'follow-on' rifaximin after CDI appeared to halve recurrence rate, we failed to reach our recruitment target in this group of frail elderly patients, so the estimated effect of rifaximin lacks precision. A meta-analysis including a previous trial suggests that rifaximin may be effective; however, further, larger confirmatory studies are needed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: RAPID Collaboration Group, Humans, Clostridium Infections, Metronidazole, Vancomycin, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Drug Administration Schedule, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Secondary Prevention, Rifaximin, Clostridioides difficile
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 08 Aug 2019 08:50
Last Modified: 31 Jan 2024 19:36
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316794
Open Access URL: https://gut.bmj.com/content/68/7/1224
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3051253