Greiffenhagen, C, Mair, M ORCID: 0000-0003-0929-5426 and Sharrock, WW
(2015)
Methodological Troubles as Problem and Phenomenon: Ethnomethodology and the Question of 'Method' in the Social Sciences.
British Journal of Sociology, 66 (3).
pp. 460-485.
This is the latest version of this item.
Text
Greiffenhagen, Mair & Sharrock - Methodological Troubles as Problems and Phenomena.pdf - Unspecified Download (603kB) |
Abstract
Across the disciplinary frontiers of the social sciences, studies by social scientists treating their own investigative practices as sites of empirical inquiry have proliferated. Most of these studies have been retrospective, historical, after‐the‐fact reconstructions of social scientific studies mixing interview data with the (predominantly textual) traces that investigations leave behind. Observational studies of in situ work in social science research are, however, relatively scarce.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | ## TULIP Type: Articles/Papers (Journal) ## |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | methodology, method, ethnomethodology, qualitative, quantitative, science and technology studies |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
Date Deposited: | 12 Feb 2016 09:06 |
Last Modified: | 16 Dec 2022 03:53 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1468-4446.12136 |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/2050900 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Methodological Troubles as Problem and Phenomenon: Ethnomethodology and the Question of 'Method' in the Social Sciences. (deposited 12 Feb 2016 09:06) [Currently Displayed]