ANDRIĆ, VUKO and TANYI, ATTILA ORCID: 0000-0002-2027-9446
(2017)
God and eternal boredom.
Religious Studies, 53 (1).
pp. 51-70.
This is the latest version of this item.
Text
rs_god_boredom.pdf - Unspecified Access to this file is embargoed until Unspecified. Download (376kB) |
|
Text
submission_final.docx - Unspecified Download (70kB) |
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>God is thought to be eternal. Does this mean that he is timeless? Or is he, rather, omnitemporal? In this article we argue that God cannot be omnitemporal. Our starting point, which we take from Bernard Williams's article on the Makropulos Case, is the intuition that it is inappropriate for persons not to become bored after a sufficiently long sequence of time has passed. If Williams is right, then it follows that, if God were omnitemporal, he would suffer from boredom. But God is the greatest possible being and therefore cannot be bored. God, hence, is not omnitemporal. After the presentation of our argument, we address several objections by examining possible differences between human and divine persons.</jats:p>
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
Date Deposited: | 11 Apr 2016 10:27 |
Last Modified: | 17 Dec 2022 01:27 |
DOI: | 10.1017/s0034412515000499 |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3000392 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
God and Eternal Boredom. (deposited 08 Apr 2016 10:19)
- God and eternal boredom. (deposited 11 Apr 2016 10:27) [Currently Displayed]