Continuities of Risk in the Era of the Mental Capacity Act

Fanning, J ORCID: 0000-0001-5371-0207 (2016) Continuities of Risk in the Era of the Mental Capacity Act. Medical Law Review, 24 (3). pp. 415-433.

Text Continuities of Risk in the Era of the Mental Capacity Act.docx - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (98kB)

Abstract

When compared with the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005, the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1983 seems an outlier. It authorises compulsory treatment of mental disorders on the basis of P’s risks. English law, therefore, discriminates between mental and physical disorders. Following the UK’s ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), the MHA probably also violates international law. Against this backdrop, one might expect that decisions contingent on risk are confined to the MHA and have no relevance elsewhere. This article argues that the opposite is true: risk-based decision-making has colonised MCA processes and plays a key role in determining the nature of P’s interaction with health services. These ‘continuities’ of risk are most notable in the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), where assessments of risk are implicitly significant for best interests and eligibility determinations. Using governmentality theory as an explanatory model, this article claims that the DOLS can be reconstructed as part of a wider legal apparatus for the regulation of the risks of harm associated with mental disorders. The article also argues that the Law Commission’s recent proposals to introduce a new ‘protective care’ scheme and expand the remit of the MHA hint at a ‘rehabilitation’ of risk as an integral component of mental health and capacity law. The article concludes that the concept’s stigmatising potential, lack of definition, and conflict with the CRPD cast doubt on its capacity to reconcile English mental health law with the era of autonomy, capacity, and non-discrimination.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	deprivation, liberty, safeguards, authorisation, autonomy, reform
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	30 Jun 2016 14:14
Last Modified:	19 Jan 2023 07:35
DOI:	10.1093/medlaw/fww036
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3001916