Consequences of in-situ strategies for the conservation of plant genetic diversity



Whitlock, R ORCID: 0000-0002-7067-8365, Hipperson, H, Thompson, DBA, Butlin, RK and Burke, T
(2016) Consequences of in-situ strategies for the conservation of plant genetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 203. 134 - 142.

[img] Text
Whitlock_etal2016_Biol_Cons.pdf - OA Published Version

Download (3MB)

Abstract

Conservation biologists have drawn up a range of guidelines for the conservation of genetic diversity—to maximise the chances that populations of threatened species persist, and to conserve this variation for its potential utility. However, our understanding of the effectiveness of conservation guidelines for maintaining genetic diversity in situ is limited. Furthermore, we lack information on how species-level variation in mating system affects these genetic conservation strategies. We used the British geographical ranges of eight widespread but declining plant species, varying in breeding system, as a model to assess the effectiveness of guidelines for the in-situ conservation of neutral genetic diversity. By applying simulated in-situ conservation scenarios to amplified fragment length polymorphism data, we show that the conservation of one population (the “minimum-set” approach) would retain ~ 70% of common allelic variation, but few or no rare alleles (alleles with frequency ≤ 0.05). Our results indicate that the conservation of > 35% of populations would be needed to reach the Convention on Biological Diversity's recommendation to conserve 70% of genetic diversity in situ, as applied to rare alleles (~ 10 populations within each species' British range). The capture of genetic variation in simulated conservation networks was insensitive to breeding system. However, a spatially stratified approach to population selection led to significantly greater capture rates for common alleles in two of our study species, relative to a spatially random strategy. Our study highlights the challenges of conserving genetic variation, and emphasises the vulnerability of genetic biodiversity to reductions in the extent of species' ranges.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: AFLP, biogeography, conservation genetics, genetic diversity, in-situ conservation, plants
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 31 Oct 2016 11:54
Last Modified: 30 Sep 2021 20:25
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.006
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3002706