Inapproximability Results for Approximate Nash Equilibria



Deligkas, Argyrios, Fearnley, John and Savani, Rahul ORCID: 0000-0003-1262-7831
(2016) Inapproximability Results for Approximate Nash Equilibria In: WINE 2016: The 12th Conference on Web and Internet Economics.

[thumbnail of note.pdf] Text
note.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript

Download (399kB)

Abstract

We study the problem of finding approximate Nash equilibria that satisfy certain conditions, such as providing good social welfare. In particular, we study the problem ϵ$$\epsilon $$-NE δ$$\delta $$-SW: find an ϵ$$\epsilon $$-approximate Nash equilibrium (ϵ$$\epsilon $$-NE) that is within δ$$\delta $$ of the best social welfare achievable by an ϵ$$\epsilon $$-NE. Our main result is that, if the randomized exponential-time hypothesis (RETH) is true, then solving 18-O(δ)$$\left( \frac{1}{8} - \mathrm {O}(\delta )\right) $$-NE O(δ)$$\mathrm {O}(\delta )$$-SW for an n×n$$n\times n$$ bimatrix game requires nΩ~(δΛlogn)$$n^{\mathrm {\widetilde{\Omega }}(\delta ^{\varLambda } \log n)}$$ time, where Λ$$\varLambda $$ is a constant.Building on this result, we show similar conditional running time lower bounds on a number of decision problems for approximate Nash equilibria that do not involve social welfare, including maximizing or minimizing a certain player’s payoff, or finding approximate equilibria contained in a given pair of supports. We show quasi-polynomial lower bounds for these problems assuming that RETH holds, and these lower bounds apply to ϵ$$\epsilon $$-Nash equilibria for all ϵ<18$$\epsilon < \frac{1}{8}$$. The hardness of these other decision problems has so far only been studied in the context of exact equilibria.

Item Type: Conference Item (Unspecified)
Uncontrolled Keywords: 46 Information and Computing Sciences, Liver Disease, Hepatitis, Digestive Diseases
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 18 Oct 2016 13:51
Last Modified: 02 Jun 2026 06:57
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-54110-4_3
Related Websites:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3003819
Disclaimer: The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.