Two Philosophies of Needs

McLeod, SK ORCID: 0000-0003-1457-2942 (2015) Two Philosophies of Needs. Polish Journal of Philosophy, 9 (1). pp. 33-50.

This is the latest version of this item.

Text
Two Philosophies of Needs ELEMENTS.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript
Download (330kB)

Official URL: http://www.pjp.edu.pl/

Abstract

Instrumentalists about need believe that all needs are instrumental, i.e., ontologically dependent upon ends, goals or purposes. Absolutists view some needs as non-instrumental. The aims of this article are: clearly to characterize the instrumentalism/absolutism debate that is of concern (mainly §1); to establish that both positions have recent and current adherents (mainly §1); to bring what is, in comparison with prior literature, a relatively high level of precision to the debate, employing some hitherto neglected, but important, insights (passim); to show, on grounds not previously to the fore in the literature, that insofar as instrumentalism’s advocates have provided arguments for the position, these are unsound (§2); to argue against instrumentalism using a new dilemma concerning whether ‘end’, ‘goal’ and ‘purpose’ are interpreted in a mentalistic manner (§3); to elucidate the implications of the needs/need-satisfiers and preconditions/means distinctions for the debate (§4).

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	## TULIP Type: Articles/Papers (Journal) ##
Uncontrolled Keywords:	absolute needs, ends, goals, instrumental needs, needs, purposes
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	11 Jan 2017 11:02
Last Modified:	19 Jan 2023 07:24
DOI:	10.5840/pjphil2015912
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3004943