Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings



Bergh, D, Sharp, B, Aguinis, H and Li, M ORCID: 0000-0001-7607-2367
(2017) Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings. Strategic Organization, 15 (3). 423 - 436.

[img] Text
Reproducibility of Study Findings Final Version.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (990kB)

Abstract

Recent studies report an inability to replicate previously published research, leading some to suggest that scientific knowledge is facing a credibility crisis. In this essay, we provide evidence on whether strategic management research may itself be vulnerable to these concerns. We conducted a study whereby we attempted to reproduce the empirical findings of 88 articles appearing in the Strategic Management Journal using data reported in the articles themselves. About 70% of the studies did not disclose enough data to permit independent tests of reproducibility of their findings. Of those that could be retested, almost one-third reported hypotheses as statistically significant which were no longer so and far more significant results were found to be non-significant in the reproductions than in the opposite direction. Collectively, incomplete reporting practices, disclosure errors, and possible opportunism limit the reproducibility of most studies. Until disclosure standards and requirements change to include more complete reporting and facilitate tests of reproducibility, the strategic management field appears vulnerable to a credibility crisis.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: knowledge credibility, replication, reporducibility
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 24 Apr 2017 07:16
Last Modified: 22 Sep 2021 13:10
DOI: 10.1177/1476127017701076
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3007032