Body shape shifting during growth permits tests that distinguish between competing geometric theories of metabolic scaling

Hirst, AG, Glazier, DS and Atkinson, D ORCID: 0000-0002-9956-2454 (2014) Body shape shifting during growth permits tests that distinguish between competing geometric theories of metabolic scaling Ecology Letters, 17 (10). pp. 1274-1281. ISSN 1461-023X, 1461-0248

Text Hirst+Body+shape+shifting+during+2014+Accepted.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (1MB)

Abstract

Metabolism fuels all of life's activities, from biochemical reactions to ecological interactions. According to two intensely debated theories, body size affects metabolism via geometrical influences on the transport of resources and wastes. However, these theories differ crucially in whether the size dependence of metabolism is derived from material transport across external surfaces, or through internal resource‐transport networks. We show that when body shape changes during growth, these models make opposing predictions. These models are tested using pelagic invertebrates, because these animals exhibit highly variable intraspecific scaling relationships for metabolic rate and body shape. Metabolic scaling slopes of diverse integument‐breathing species were significantly positively correlated with degree of body flattening or elongation during ontogeny, as expected from surface area theory, but contradicting the negative correlations predicted by resource‐transport network models. This finding explains strong deviations from predictions of widely adopted theory, and underpins a new explanation for mass‐invariant metabolic scaling during ontogeny in animals and plants.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	## TULIP Type: Articles/Papers (Journal) ##
Uncontrolled Keywords:	body size, energetics, geometry, respiration
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	11 Aug 2017 13:29
Last Modified:	01 Mar 2026 00:44
DOI:	10.1111/ele.12334
Related Websites:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3008927
Disclaimer:	The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.