Current evidence-based recommendations on investigating children with global developmental delay

Mithyantha, R, Kneen, R, McCann, E and Gladstone, M ORCID: 0000-0002-2579-9301 (2017) Current evidence-based recommendations on investigating children with global developmental delay Archives of Disease in Childhood, 102 (11). pp. 1071-1076. ISSN 0003-9888, 1468-2044

Text mithyanatha investigation of developmental delay.pdf - Published version Download (457kB)

Abstract

Introduction Global developmental delay (GDD) affects 1%-3% of the population of children under 5 years of age, making it one of the most common conditions presenting in paediatric clinics; causes are exogenous, genetic (non-metabolic) or genetic (metabolic). Recent advances in biotechnology and genetic testing mean that the investigations available to perform for children under 5 years are increasing and are more sensitive than previously. This change in availability and type of testing necessitates an update in the recommendations for investigating GDD. Methods We conducted a review of the literature from 2006 to 2016 to identify articles with evidence relating to the investigation of developmental delay in children under the age of 5 years. We collated the evidence into first-line and second-line investigations and, where available, on their yield and cost implications. Results We have provided up-to-date guidance for first-line and second-line investigations for children with GDD under the age of 5 years. Recent evidence demonstrates that genetic testing for all children with unexplained GDD should be first line, if an exogenous cause is not already established. Our review of the literature demonstrates that all patients, irrespective of severity of GDD, should have investigations for treatable conditions. Evidence demonstrates that the yield for treatable conditions is higher than previously thought and that investigations for these metabolic conditions should be considered as first line. Additional second-line investigations can be led by history, examination and developmental trajectories. Discussion We may need to update present recommendations in the UK for investigation of developmental delay. This would include microarray testing as first line and a more thorough approach to investigations for metabolic disorders that can be treated. Clinical assessment remains vital for guiding investigations.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Humans, Developmental Disabilities, Evidence-Based Medicine, Child, Child, Preschool, Infant, Female, Male, Genetic Testing
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	20 Oct 2017 15:25
Last Modified:	01 Mar 2026 05:49
DOI:	10.1136/archdischild-2016-311271
Related Websites:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3010528
Disclaimer:	The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.