Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire


Mylvaganam, Senthurun, Conroy, Elizabeth, Williamson, Paula R ORCID: 0000-0001-9802-6636, Barnes, Nicola LP, Cutress, Ramsey I, Gardiner, Matthew D, Jain, Abhilash, Skillman, Joanna M, Thrush, Steven, Whisker, Lisa J et al (show 3 more authors) (2017) Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire BREAST, 35. pp. 182-190. ISSN 0960-9776, 1532-3080

[thumbnail of C:\Users\ejconroy\Dropbox\Other\iBra NPQ 1.pdf] Text
C:\Users\ejconroy\Dropbox\Other\iBra NPQ 1.pdf - Published version
Download (794kB)

Abstract

Introduction The introduction of biological and synthetic meshes has revolutionised the practice of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) but evidence for effectiveness is lacking. The iBRA (implant Breast Reconstruction evAluation) study is a national trainee-led project that aims to explore the practice and outcomes of IBBR to inform the design of a future trial. We report the results of the iBRA National Practice Questionnaire (NPQ) which aimed to comprehensively describe the provision and practice of IBBR across the UK. Methods A questionnaire investigating local practice and service provision of IBBR developed by the iBRA Steering Group was completed by trainee and consultant leads at breast and plastic surgical units across the UK. Summary data for each survey item were calculated and variation between centres and overall provision of care examined. Results 81 units within 79 NHS-hospitals completed the questionnaire. Units offered a range of reconstructive techniques, with IBBR accounting for 70% (IQR:50–80%) of participating units' immediate procedures. Units on average were staffed by 2.5 breast surgeons (IQR:2.0–3.0) and 2.0 plastic surgeons (IQR:1.0–3.0) performing 35 IBBR cases per year (IQR:20-50). Variation was demonstrated in the provision of novel different techniques for IBBR especially the use of biological (n = 62) and synthetic (n = 25) meshes and in patient selection for these procedures. Conclusions The iBRA-NPQ has demonstrated marked variation in the provision and practice of IBBR in the UK. The prospective audit phase of the iBRA study will determine the safety and effectiveness of different approaches to IBBR and allow evidence-based best practice to be explored.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Survey, Implant-based reconstruction, Acellular dermal matrix, Dermal sling, Current practice, Breast reconstruction
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 31 Oct 2017 16:27
Last Modified: 16 Jun 2026 04:21
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.07.016
Related Websites:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3011215
Disclaimer: The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.
Altmetric
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)