A Gramscian Approach to Studying the Judicial Decision-Making Process

Ciocchini, P ORCID: 0000-0003-4465-7891 and Khoury, S ORCID: 0000-0002-0029-9802 (2018) A Gramscian Approach to Studying the Judicial Decision-Making Process. Critical Criminology, 26 (1). pp. 75-90.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Official URL: https://www.springernature.com/

Abstract

This paper applies a Gramscian analytical framework to scrutinise the judicial decision-making process. Based on two distinct research projects, the article explores how, on one hand judges in criminal courts can be identified as part of the bureaucratic machinery of the state, as ‘technicians of repression’; whereas, on the other hand, human rights judges can be distinguished as providing ‘moral and intellectual leadership’ in their production and reproduction of certain values. Some of the key questions this article seeks to answer are: What is the role of hegemony in the judicial decision-making process? To what extent are legal actors both ‘technicians of repression’ and ‘moral and intellectual leaders’? This paper uses examples from empirical research conducted at courts in Argentina and at the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights to identify and explore this dual role of judges as both repressive technicians and moral and intellectual leaders in neo-liberal capitalist societies.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	01 Nov 2017 08:08
Last Modified:	15 Mar 2024 07:09
DOI:	10.1007/s10612-017-9377-4
Open Access URL:	https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s106...
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3011271