Fenwick, John D, Georgiou, Georgios, Rowbottom, Carl G ORCID: 0000-0002-5716-6840, Underwood, Tracy SA, Kumar, Sudhir and Nahum, Alan E
(2018)
Origins of the changing detector response in small megavoltage photon radiation fields.
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 63 (12).
125003-.
Text
Origins paper - minor rev.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (720kB) |
Abstract
Differences in detector response between measured small fields, f <sub>clin,</sub> and wider reference fields, f <sub>msr</sub> , can be overcome by using correction factors [Formula: see text] or by designing detectors with field-size invariant responses. The changing response in small fields is caused by perturbations of the electron fluence within the detector sensitive volume. For solid-state detectors, it has recently been suggested that these perturbations might be caused by the non-water-equivalent effective atomic numbers Z of detector materials, rather than by their non-water-like densities. Using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code we have analyzed the response of a PTW 60017 diode detector in a 6 MV beam, calculating the [Formula: see text] correction factor from computed doses absorbed by water and by the detector sensitive volume in 0.5 × 0.5 and 4 × 4 cm<sup>2</sup> fields. In addition to the 'real' detector, fully modelled according to the manufacturer's blue-prints, we calculated doses and [Formula: see text] factors for a 'Z → water' detector variant in which mass stopping-powers and microscopic interaction coefficients were set to those of water while preserving real material densities, and for a 'density → 1' variant in which densities were set to 1 g cm<sup>-3</sup>, leaving mass stopping-powers and interaction coefficients at real levels. [Formula: see text] equalled 0.910 ± 0.005 (2 standard deviations) for the real detector, was insignificantly different at 0.912 ± 0.005 for the 'Z → H<sub>2</sub>O' variant, but equalled 1.012 ± 0.006 for the 'density → 1' variant. For the 60017 diode in a 6 MV beam, then, [Formula: see text] was determined primarily by the detector's density rather than its atomic composition. Further calculations showed this remained the case in a 15 MV beam. Interestingly, the sensitive volume electron fluence was perturbed more by detector atomic composition than by density; however, the density-dependent perturbation varied with field-size, whereas the Z-dependent perturbation was relatively constant, little affecting [Formula: see text].
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | small field, detector response, density, atomic number, Monte Carlo |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
Date Deposited: | 21 May 2018 06:51 |
Last Modified: | 01 Feb 2024 20:59 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1361-6560/aac478 |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3021505 |