Revisionary Epistemology

Fassio, Davide and McKenna, Robin ORCID: 0000-0001-5129-7850
(2015) Revisionary Epistemology. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 58 (7-8). pp. 755-779.

[img] Text
Revisionary_Epistemology.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript

Download (269kB)


What is knowledge? What should knowledge be like? Call an epistemological project that sets out to answer the first question ‘descriptive’ and a project that sets out to answer the second question ‘normative’. If the answers to these two questions don’t coincide—if what knowledge should be like differs from what knowledge is like—there is room for a third project we call ‘revisionary’. A revisionary project starts by arguing that what knowledge should be differs from what knowledge is. It then proposes that we revise our account of knowledge accordingly. Our aim in this paper was to develop a methodology for revisionary projects in epistemology. Put roughly, the thought is that we start by looking at the various things that we expect knowledge to do for us. Once we have a list of the various things we expect knowledge to do for us we have a ‘job description’; a list of tasks we need done, and that we expect knowledge to perform. With the job description in hand, we can ask what knowledge would have to be like in order to perform these tasks. Along the way we give some reasons for embarking on a revisionary project in epistemology, and we outline what the upshot might be.

Item Type: Article
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 12 Sep 2018 15:23
Last Modified: 19 Jan 2023 01:17
DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2015.1083468
Related URLs: