Prevalence of hepatitis D virus infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis



Stockdale, AJ ORCID: 0000-0002-5828-3328, Chaponda, M, Beloukas, A ORCID: 0000-0001-5639-0528, Phillips, RO, Matthews, PC, Papadimitropoulos, A ORCID: 0000-0001-9822-4931, King, S, Bonnett, L ORCID: 0000-0002-6981-9212 and Geretti, AM ORCID: 0000-0002-3670-6588
(2017) Prevalence of hepatitis D virus infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 5 (10). E992 - E1003.

This is the latest version of this item.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

Background Hepatitis D virus (also known as hepatitis delta virus) can establish a persistent infection in people with chronic hepatitis B, leading to accelerated progression of liver disease. In sub-Saharan Africa, where HBsAg prevalence is higher than 8%, hepatitis D virus might represent an important additive cause of chronic liver disease. We aimed to establish the prevalence of hepatitis D virus among HBsAg-positive populations in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods We systematically reviewed studies of hepatitis D virus prevalence among HBsAg-positive populations in sub-Saharan Africa. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for papers published between Jan 1, 1995, and Aug 30, 2016, in which patient selection criteria and geographical setting were described. Search strings included sub-Saharan Africa, the countries therein, and permutations of hepatitis D virus. Cohort data were also added from HIV-positive populations in Malawi and Ghana. Populations undergoing assessment in liver disease clinics and those sampled from other populations (defined as general populations) were analysed. We did a meta-analysis with a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model to calculate a pooled estimate of hepatitis D virus seroprevalence. Findings Of 374 studies identified by our search, 30 were included in our study, only eight of which included detection of hepatitis D virus RNA among anti-hepatitis D virus seropositive participants. In west Africa, the pooled seroprevalence of hepatitis D virus was 7·33% (95% CI 3·55–12·20) in general populations and 9·57% (2·31–20·43) in liver-disease populations. In central Africa, seroprevalence was 25·64% (12·09–42·00) in general populations and 37·77% (12·13–67·54) in liver-disease populations. In east and southern Africa, seroprevalence was 0·05% (0·00–1·78) in general populations. The odds ratio for anti-hepatitis D virus detection among HBsAg-positive patients with liver fibrosis or hepatocellular carcinoma was 5·24 (95% CI 2·74–10·01; p<0·0001) relative to asymptomatic controls. Interpretation Findings suggest localised clusters of hepatitis D virus endemicity across sub-Saharan Africa. Epidemiological data are needed from southern and east Africa, and from patients with established liver disease. Further studies should aim to define the reliability of hepatitis D virus testing methods, identify risk factors for transmission, and characterise the natural history of the infection in the region. Funding Wellcome Trust, Royal Society.

Item Type: Article
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 30 Jan 2019 16:38
Last Modified: 22 Nov 2021 21:11
DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30298-X
Open Access URL: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/P...
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3029140

Available Versions of this Item