Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys

Gorgon, Elizabeth, Crew, Richard, Burnside, Girvan ORCID: 0000-0001-7398-1346 and Williamson, Paula R ORCID: 0000-0001-9802-6636 (2019) Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 108. pp. 110-120. ISSN 0895-4356, 1878-5921

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Text Response rates in COS Delphi_v2.0_JCE_2ndresubmission_clean.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (1MB)

Abstract

Objectives: The Delphi method is commonly used to achieve consensus in core outcome set (COS) development. It is important to try to maximize response rates to Delphi studies and minimize attrition rates and potential for bias. The factors that impact response rates in a Delphi study used for COS development are unknown. The objective of this study was to explore the impact of design characteristics on response rates in Delphi surveys within COS development. Methods: Published and ongoing studies that included Delphi to develop a COS were eligible. Second round voting response rates were analyzed, and multilevel linear regression was conducted to investigate whether design characteristics were associated with the response rate. Results: Thirty-one studies were included. Two characteristics were significantly associated with a lower response rate: larger panels and studies with more items included. Conclusion: COS developers should pay attention to methods when designing a COS development study; in particular, the size of the panels and the size of the list of outcomes. We identified other potential design characteristics that might influence response rates but were unable to explore them in this analysis. These should be reported in future reports to allow for further investigation.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Outcomes, Delphi, Research methodology, Core outcome set
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	11 Dec 2018 16:10
Last Modified:	16 Jun 2026 06:21
DOI:	10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.010
Open Access URL:	https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...
Related Websites:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3029889
Disclaimer:	The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.