Enhancing practitioners' confidence in recruitment and consent in the EcLiPSE trial: a mixed-method evaluation of site training - a Paediatric Emergency Research in the United Kingdom and Ireland (PERUKI) study


Woolfall, Kerry ORCID: 0000-0002-5726-5304, Roper, Louise ORCID: 0000-0002-2918-7628, Humphreys, Amy, Lyttle, Mark D, Messahel, Shrouk, Lee, Elizabeth, Noblet, Joanne, Iyer, Anand, Gamble, Carrol ORCID: 0000-0002-3021-1955, Hickey, Helen ORCID: 0000-0003-0467-0362 et al (show 2 more authors) (2019) Enhancing practitioners' confidence in recruitment and consent in the EcLiPSE trial: a mixed-method evaluation of site training - a Paediatric Emergency Research in the United Kingdom and Ireland (PERUKI) study. TRIALS, 20 (1). 181-.

[img] Text
Trials 2019 SIV.pdf - Published version
Download (958kB)

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>EcLiPSE (Emergency treatment with Levetiracetam or Phenytoin in Status Epilepticus in children) is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the United Kingdom. Challenges to success include the need to immediately administer an intervention without informed consent and changes in staffing during trial conduct, mainly due to physician rotations. Using literature on parents' perspectives and research without prior consent (RWPC) guidance, we developed an interactive training package (including videos, simulation and question and answer sessions) and evaluated its dissemination and impact upon on practitioners' confidence in recruitment and consent.<h4>Methods</h4>Questionnaires were administered before and immediately after training followed by telephone interviews (mean 11 months later), focus groups (mean 14 months later) and an online questionnaire (8 months before trial closure).<h4>Results</h4>One hundred and twenty-five practitioners from 26/30 (87%) participating hospitals completed a questionnaire before and after training. We conducted 10 interviews and six focus groups (comprising 36 practitioners); 199 practitioners working in all recruiting hospitals completed the online questionnaire. Before training, practitioners were concerned about recruitment and consent. Confidence increased after training for explaining (all scale 0-5, 95% CIs above 0 and p values < 0.05): the study (66% improved mean score before 3.28 and after 4.52), randomisation (47% improvement, 3.86 to 4.63), RWPC (72% improvement, 2.98 to 4.39), and addressing parents' objections to randomisation (51% improvement, 3.37 to 4.25). Practitioners rated highly the content and clarity of the training, which was successfully disseminated. Some concerns about staff availability for training and consent discussions remained.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Training improved practitioners' confidence in recruitment and RWPC. Our findings highlight the value of using parents' perspectives to inform training and to engage practitioners in trials that are at high risk of being too challenging to conduct.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Clinical trials, Practitioner training, Research without prior consent, Deferred consent, Paediatric emergency care, Recruitment
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 25 Mar 2019 08:39
Last Modified: 19 Jan 2023 00:56
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3273-z
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3034706
Dimensions
Altmetric
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)