Comity in US Courts



Schultz, Thomas and Ridi, N ORCID: 0000-0002-7118-9555
(2018) Comity in US Courts. Northeastern University Law Review.

[img] Text
SSRN-id2896960.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (818kB) | Preview

Abstract

Few legal concepts divide opinions as much as comity. Some regard it as the rationale and very foundation of current conflicts of law and foreign relations law. Others see in it nothing more than a useless, and quite dead, relic of the past. The reality, as this article shows, is that comity thrives in the judicial decisions and is indeed capable of mitigating many global problems relating to the interaction of legal systems. But it can only fulfill its potential if we can dispel the current confusion surrounding it. This requires digging deep into a complex narrative, unfolding in intertwined tales of misunderstandings, ethical battles, and nation-building efforts. This article focuses on the American experience with comity, but views it within a broader international dimension, accounting for its global influence outside the U.S.A. What emerges is, on one side, the most solidly grounded scholarly understanding of comity to date and, on the other side, clearer guidance for courts in a variety of situations involving matters of restraint or recognition.

Item Type: Article
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 12 Jun 2019 10:29
Last Modified: 09 Jan 2021 03:31
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3045435