Shiel, Huw, Hutter, Oliver S ORCID: 0000-0002-8838-8956, Phillips, Laurie J
ORCID: 0000-0001-5181-1565, Al Turkestani, Mohammed, Dhanak, Vin R, Veal, Tim D
ORCID: 0000-0002-0610-5626, Durose, Ken
ORCID: 0000-0003-1183-3211 and Major, Jonathan D
ORCID: 0000-0002-5554-1985
(2019)
Chemical etching of Sb2Se3 solar cells: surface chemistry and back contact behaviour.
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-ENERGY, 1 (4).
045001-045001.
This is the latest version of this item.
Text
Chemical_etching_of_Sb2Se3_solar_cells__no_supplementary_info_.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The effect of (NH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub>)<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>S and CS<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> chemical etches on surface chemistry and contacting in Sb<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>Se<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> solar cells was investigated via a combination of x-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and photovoltaic device analysis. Thin film solar cells were produced in superstrate configuration with an absorber layer deposited by close space sublimation. Devices of up to 5.7% efficiency were compared via current–voltage measurements (<jats:italic>J–V</jats:italic>) and temperature-dependent current–voltage (<jats:italic>J</jats:italic>–<jats:italic>V</jats:italic>–<jats:italic>T)</jats:italic> analysis. XPS analysis demonstrated that both etching processes were successful in removing Sb<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> contamination, while there was no decrease in free elemental selenium content by either etch, in contrast to prior work. Using <jats:italic>J</jats:italic>–<jats:italic>V</jats:italic>–<jats:italic>T</jats:italic> analysis the removal of Sb<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> at the back surface in etched samples was found to improve contacting by reducing the potential barrier at the back contact from 0.43 eV to 0.26 eV and lowering the series resistance. However, <jats:italic>J</jats:italic>–<jats:italic>V</jats:italic> data showed that due to the decrease in shunt resistance and short-circuit current as a result of etching, the devices show a lower efficiency following both etches, despite a lowering of the series resistance. Further optimisation of the etching process yielded an improved efficiency of 6.6%. This work elucidates the role of surface treatments in Sb<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>Se<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> devices and resolves inconsistencies in previously published works.</jats:p>
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | photovoltaics, antimony selenide, Sb2Se3, solar cells, photoemission, XPS, etching |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
Date Deposited: | 27 Aug 2019 10:33 |
Last Modified: | 19 Jan 2023 00:28 |
DOI: | 10.1088/2515-7655/ab3c98 |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3052638 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Chemical etching of Sb2Se3 solar cells: Surface chemistry and back contact behaviour. (deposited 21 Aug 2019 07:53)
- Chemical etching of Sb2Se3 solar cells: surface chemistry and back contact behaviour. (deposited 27 Aug 2019 10:33) [Currently Displayed]