The Responsible Dog Owner: The Construction of Responsibility



Westgarth, Carri ORCID: 0000-0003-0471-2761, Christley, Robert M ORCID: 0000-0001-9250-3032, Marvin, Garry and Perkins, Elizabeth ORCID: 0000-0002-0213-8105
(2019) The Responsible Dog Owner: The Construction of Responsibility. ANTHROZOOS, 32 (5). pp. 631-646.

This is the latest version of this item.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.
[img] Text
The Responsible Dog Owner The Construction of Responsibility.pdf - Published version

Download (761kB) | Preview

Abstract

Policy and campaigning messages related to dog ownership and welfare center on the concept of responsible ownership. However, the perspectives and experiences of pet owners and how they perceive and perform their responsibilities has not been studied in depth. This qualitative study used conversations about owning and walking dogs in order to elucidate beliefs and views about responsibility in dog ownership. Data comprised 12 in-depth interviews with dog-owning households, 14 short interviews with dog owners while walking their dogs or representing their breed at a dog show, and autoethnography of the first author’s experiences owning and walking dogs. All participants considered themselves responsible dog owners, yet there was great variation in key aspects of their dog-owning behavior. The feelings of responsibility were rooted in the valued unconditional and reciprocal love that owners believed underpinned their human–dog bond. Dogs were described as dependents, similar to, but different from, children. In deciding how to look after their dogs, owners sought to balance their views of dogs as kin, having individual needs to be met, with consideration of the needs of others. Four processes through which issues of irresponsible dog ownership may arise were suggested: owner–dog relationship being too weak or too strong; differences in interpretation of what is best for the dog; difficulties predicting and avoiding situations of conflict; and differences in tolerance of negative impacts of dog ownership. While “responsible dog ownership” has considerable appeal as a concept, how it is perceived and interpreted varies so extensively that simply telling owners that they should “be responsible” is of limited use as a message to promote behavior change. Facilitating “responsible dog ownership” and reducing “irresponsible dog owner” behaviors relies on a detailed understanding of the variables which influence how the dog’s role is constructed within the family and the wider society.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: animal welfare, dogs, human-animal interaction, ownership, policy, qualitative research
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 15 Oct 2019 14:47
Last Modified: 27 Feb 2023 20:54
DOI: 10.1080/08927936.2019.1645506
Open Access URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/089279...
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3058275

Available Versions of this Item